I don't know what women go through when they're on their periods. I know it involves being self-involved, making internal excuses for irrational behavior (look, it's not funny – or rather it wouldn't be if there isn't an element of truth to the stereotype that batshit female behavior often coincides with doing the tampon tango) and lunging like a starving hyena in pajama bottoms for a bar of chocolate or whatever comfort food seems to fit the bill.
Incidentally, pajama bottoms are the modern equivalent of a flannel fucking nightgown. I comprehend the idea behind them. I also know for a fact that if you sit a drop-dead gorgeous woman in front of me wearing an oversized hoodie and a pair of pajama bottoms, almost every man in the world would likely go “eh? Eh” and chase after the girl in the stretchy yoga pants, regardless of whether or not she looked like the current incarnation of Kim Kardashian (how can someone so vapid and so incredibly, completely and totally useless as anything other than entertainment still be so hot?)
I hate the existence of pajama bottoms. I have since my days of college. I hate seeing them, I hate trying to convince women they're unattractive and look ridiculous, and I refuse to buy any for myself on the same general principle that I refuse to buy a pair of bunny slippers. If I can't go outside in clothing or make a run to the store to pick up something, then it is not clothing. I am not a doctor, a nurse, or a med student, so I don't wear scrubs. If I'm wearing comfortable clothing around the house it's a pair of pants and a t-shirt that was well-broken in long before I bought it.
Don't get me wrong. I found the concept of formal wear, suits and ties repellent mainly in the idea of buying and taking care of them. Funny thing is, though, now I have the “nice jeans” I wear to work and the “around the house jeans” – the ones frayed at the hem from being dragged along, the knees comfortably bent, the pants pockets in the rear showing holes.
Before I'm accused of being sexist and insisting women be held to a different standard, I'll point out that I married a woman who has dressed up for work exactly twice since I have known her, has worn a dress exactly twenty-two times in my memory (once on our wedding day) and refuses to wear makeup on principle (which I still argue is informed in part by an inability to give a flying goat's nutsack about the latest makeup line from MAC or Avon or Maybelline). I own more business suits and outfits than she does, and I also find it somewhat ironic that with my intense dislike of pajama bottoms – which I didn't tell her about until recently – she owns more pairs of “comfy pants” than I think she owns pairs of jeans.
I also love her for all of these things, but also know the minute she steps into a power suit and heels, I may well have a new fetish. She looks -good– dressed up, but she hates doing it and revels wearing the very thing I could happily deposit into the donation bin without a second thought.
It is, in short, the thing I hate more than waking up early on a weekend – the arrival of the fucking pajama bottoms for a day-long appearance.
I also find people who wear sweat pants on a daily basis annoying as hell. Partially because as someone with a 6'5” frame you would LOVE to have the fashion choices most people under 6'1” get to make, and they wear…sweat pants.
I would gleefully strangle someone with a pair of Hanes double-knits if I could get away with it. I've lived for periods of time in the Midwest and on the east side of Seattle, where you see women of certain ages moving from what would be considered sensible, sexy, even daring outfits, then migrating into the herds of SUV-driving women in tracksuits, with expanding waistlines to match. There are times when I've sat in a food court in the more affluent shopping centers of my home city and watched women with frosted hair and long pearl necklaces wolfing their way through a salad, wearing stylish shoes with a matching track top and bottoms. The outfits make perfect sense – why make yourself up when all you're doing is going shopping? Might as well be comfortable.
The only problem is there's something to be said about wearing the clothing that's uncomfortable as hell. To a large extent, comfortable = frump / hobo. My most uncomfortable clothing is also the clothing that makes me look the best. Some of my really nice clothes make me look great – the tuxedo, cummerbund and tie that I know how to array in dishabille make me look good. The linen suits I've owned always are comfortable as hell. The discomfort comes from knowing that this clothing is something I don't want to ruin – so I don't wear it in the garden or when I take The Beast for a walk (or in his mind, Food Guy gets the Rope Thing and We Go Exploring Around Our House Until I Get Tired And Look At Him Hoping He'll Pick Me Up And Carry Me. The problem is, this worked when he was a cute little puppy of eight weeks and 15lbs. Now he's a cute little puppy of two years and 175lbs. Unless your leg is broken, you're walking your own ass home, dog.)
But by definition, pajama bottoms are meant to do one thing – keep your ass warm when you sleep. They're loungewear, and I can't ever understand needing to lounge that much. The concept of changing clothing to do multiple things is constrictive to me, so I figure if you have to put on different clothes to go out, and change back into those pants when you come back, it's a layer of “oh, I'd have to go do that to go out” that effectively constrains your ability to do just that. Keys in pocket and go. It's worse if you think of it as a procrastination tool, which is exactly what my first girlfriend in college used it to do.
Angela couldn't actually go out somewhere if she was wearing her pajama bottoms. Those were what she slept in, ran around the dorm halls in, etc. Except the morning I pounded on her dorm room door and woke her up to go to our last final of the year. Then she panicked, because not only had she overslept, she'd overslept and not put on her makeup, done her hair, etc, etc, etc. I gave her a once-over, said, “It's Finals Week. Get dressed afterwards” and hauled her out the door, skidding to our seats just as the professor closed and locked the door. She kept hiding behind my bulk, borrowing a baseball cap out of my bag midway through because she didn't feel like she was actually able to be seen by anyone without careful layers of foundation, eyeliner, eye shadow, etc., etc. Angela was what most women now would call “high maintenance”, but she was also the most low-key person I met there. She knew what she wanted and she was going to school to get it. That I was both a good study partner and relatively easy on the eyes made me a good combination.
We gnawed our way through the final and went back the quarter mile across campus to her dorm, where Angela immediately set to work showering, shaving, curling, styling, and smearing makeup over her face. She came back from the bathroom looking like we were going out – which I then promptly ruined by doing what most hormonally charged teenagers do confronted by a woman in a matching pair of bra and panties who looks like she's about to go out on the town. But it didn't matter – the armaments for the outside world were on, and when we did venture out (after a five-minute repair job) to have dinner and go hurl stone-like bread crumbs at the increasingly nimble ducks along the mill race, even in a basic shirt and jeans, she looked like she could march into Washington DC and slam a stack of papers on the nearest Supreme Court Justice's desk.
Apparently that's what she does now, so more power to her.
But as a result I've always detested pajama bottoms – the more twee and cute and “ooo, the little fuzzy [insert animal here]” they are, the more I've hated them. It's as if the textile manufacturers of the world specifically target beer-referenced pajama bottoms to guys (who, let's face it, would much rather be drinking the eight pack of Guinness than wearing the pajama bottoms purchased with the money instead) while attempting to delude otherwise intelligent women into believing that a pair of hot pink and purple bottoms made out of heavy cotton flannel are adorable. They're not. If I must, absolutely MUST buy sleepwear for anyone, adorable daughters included, those pants are going to look like they've been run through a Russian discount surgical outlet with pockets for useful things, like, say, baseball bats down the side.
But The Girl loves her pajama bottoms with almost the exact same level of adoration as the level of antipathy that I carry for them. And so goes my subtle nods to things like yoga pants, or Athleta or Prana's latest catalogs, hoping that at some point the detested loungewear could be consigned to the bin of All Things Not At All Sexy.
To a certain extent that's what I think the pajama bottoms mean – they're the symbol, like a security blanket or a mug of hot cocoa that Now Is My Time, and My Time Is Going to Be Mine, and This Is Not Meant To Be Sexy. It's small wonder that leaping into comfortable, stretchy clothing is something that is almost always depicted in mass media as something going hand-in-hand with idiot males being idiot males, pints of ice cream and curling up on the couch with an empowering glass of white wine.
I hate that, too. If you're going to go off and have a good long sulk or cry or pity party, you might as well do it in a full length ball gown and tiara; planting your ass squarely in a pair of flannel trousers under a blanket isn't going to do you any good other than to ID you as either a college student in a hurry, someone who's just gotten out of a nine-hour surgery, or someone who uses the word “yummy” in a sentence with no hint of deprecation or irony. (Seriously, if you do this to my face I will growl at you. No human being who is capable of taking a shit on their own should use this word, and no woman over the age of 30 who isn't using it in a food-contextual conversation with a child should do so either. Any male of any age above six needs to be smacked upside the head for using it non-ironically, and this does not include hipster males of any age or creed, since my general opinion is that their default requirement is to be smacked upside the head in any case.)
To some extent I'd love to reincarnate the smoking jacket for modern men – a jacket worn with the intention of being the equivalent of the pajama pants of women. Pockets for things like pens, tissues, maybe a liner for one of those baby wipe packages or a roll of dog poop bags. Comfortable. Washable, durable. A place for a pipe or (since we do live in Washington) an airtight container capable of holding a few grams of combustible materials of your choice. And the point is not to be “comfy” or to revel in being at home, but to revive the idea that you can look stylish and be comfortable in something approximating a robe without turning into a straight-up slob.
Granted, if I'm going to be a father, I think a patch on the shoulder capable of being both puke and pee-proof for burping babies would be a good thing, too. Washable would be another bonus. Reversible with another pattern on the inside? Even better.
In any case, I still cling (perhaps in a misguided way) to the belief that comfortable clothing shouldn't be used as an escape to look good, but rather a way to keep yourself grounded in the moment of where you are. My most comfortable pair of jeans is actually the nicest pair I own – and yet I'll still grub out in the garden and happily wipe off dog puke with a little Febreeze and wear them another day.
And yet I've still worn those jeans to see Puccini in box seats at the Seattle Opera. Yes, I wore a pair of nice shoes, a tweed jacket and a shirt that didn't have a crew neck, but still. I wore jeans. I'm not asking for the world, pajama bottom addicts of the world – I'm just asking that you don't wear the damned things that make you look like you're trying to masquerade as a permanent twelve-year old girl.